Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/89716
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Equity-oriented monitoring in the context of Universal Health Coverage
Author: Hosseinpoor, A.
Bergen, N.
Koller, T.
Prasad, A.
Schlotheuber, A.
Valentine, N.
Lynch, J.
Vega, J.
Citation: PLoS Medicine, 2014; 11(9):e1001727-1-e1001727-9
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 1549-1277
1549-1676
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor, Nicole Bergen, Theadora Koller, Amit Prasad, Anne Schlotheuber, Nicole Valentine, John Lynch, Jeanette Vega
Abstract: Monitoring inequalities in health is fundamental to the equitable and progressive realization of universal health coverage (UHC). A successful approach to global inequality monitoring must be intuitive enough for widespread adoption, yet maintain technical credibility. This article discusses methodological considerations for equity-oriented monitoring of UHC, and proposes recommendations for monitoring and target setting. Inequality is multidimensional, such that the extent of inequality may vary considerably across different dimensions such as economic status, education, sex, and urban/rural residence. Hence, global monitoring should include complementary dimensions of inequality (such as economic status and urban/rural residence) as well as sex. For a given dimension of inequality, subgroups for monitoring must be formulated taking into consideration applicability of the criteria across countries and subgroup heterogeneity. For economic-related inequality, we recommend forming subgroups as quintiles, and for urban/rural inequality we recommend a binary categorization. Inequality spans populations, thus appropriate approaches to monitoring should be based on comparisons between two subgroups (gap approach) or across multiple subgroups (whole spectrum approach). When measuring inequality absolute and relative measures should be reported together, along with disaggregated data; inequality should be reported alongside the national average. We recommend targets based on proportional reductions in absolute inequality across populations. Building capacity for health inequality monitoring is timely, relevant, and important. The development of high-quality health information systems, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting practices that are linked to review and evaluation cycles across health systems, will enable effective global and national health inequality monitoring. These actions will support equity-oriented progressive realization of UHC.
Keywords: Humans
Socioeconomic Factors
Health Resources
Health Status Disparities
Global Health
Universal Health Insurance
Rights: © 2014 Hosseinpoor et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001727
Grant ID: NHMRC
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001727
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_89716.pdfPublished version534.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.