Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/98894
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, A.en
dc.contributor.authorKlugárová, J.en
dc.contributor.authorYan, H.en
dc.contributor.authorFlorescu, S.en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 2015; 13(3):188-195en
dc.identifier.issn1744-1595en
dc.identifier.issn1744-1609en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/98894-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Evidence-based healthcare focuses on the need to use interventions that are supported by the best available and most up-to-date evidence or knowledge. Many clinical questions cannot be fully answered by evidence derived from quantitative or qualitative research designs alone, since many areas in healthcare are supported by clinicians' tacit knowledge derived from their clinical experiences. In this situation, evidence generated from a systematic review of text and opinion may be required as the best available evidence. The aim of this study is to highlight the importance and role of expert opinion synthesis in healthcare, and present results of an international methodological group review. METHODS: A methodological group was formed to review this approach, and update the guidance and processes for undertaking a systematic review of text and opinion. RESULTS: The methodology of systematic reviews of text and opinion had already been developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. We reviewed and updated several steps in the process, such as inclusion criteria, search strategy, critical appraisal and data extraction. CONCLUSIONS: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for the systematic review of text and opinion is unique, and continuously evolving and being further developed. Systematic reviews of text and opinion may be considered as legitimate sources of evidence, especially when there is an absence of other research designs.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAlexa McArthur, Jitka Klugárová, Hu Yan and Silvia Florescuen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe Joanna Briggs Instituteen
dc.rights© 2015 University of Adelaide, Joanna Briggs Instituteen
dc.subjectexpert opinion; meta-synthesis; narrative; systematic review; texten
dc.titleInnovations in the systematic review of text and opinionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030039129en
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/xeb.0000000000000060en
dc.identifier.pubid195560-
pubs.library.collectionPublic Health publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS08en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMcArthur, A. [0000-0001-6542-892X]en
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.