Nursing publications

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/2440/65311

Browse

Browsing Nursing publications by Author "Adelson, P."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    ItemMetadata only
    A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    (BioMed Central, 2015) Wilkinson, C.; Adelson, P.; Turnbull, D.
    One in four Australian births are induced. If cervical ripening using a prostaglandin is required, a pre-labour overnight hospitalisation and separation from family and support companions is necessary. Recent evidence shows that balloon catheter cervical ripening is just as effective as prostaglandins, but does not cause uterine stimulation. For women with low risk pregnancies, this offers the possibility of undergoing the overnight ripening process in their own home. We conducted a pilot randomised trial to assess the outcomes, clinical pathways and acceptability to both women and clinicians of outpatient balloon catheter ripening compared with usual inpatient care.Forty-eight women with low risk term pregnancies were randomised (2:1) to either outpatient (n = 33) or inpatient double-balloon catheter (n = 15) cervical ripening. Although not powered for statistically significant differences, the study explored potential direction of effect for key clinical outcomes such as oxytocin use, caesarean section and morbidities. Feedback on acceptability was sought from women at catheter insertion and 4 weeks after the birth, and from midwives and doctors, at the end of the study.Clinical and perinatal outcomes were similar. Most women required oxytocin (77 %). The outpatient group were 24 % less likely to require oxytocin (risk difference -23.6 %, 95 % CI -43.8 to -3.5). There were no failed inductions, infections or uterine hyperstimulation attributable to the catheter in either group. Most women in both groups reported discomfort with insertion and wearing the catheter, but were equally satisfied with their care and felt the baby was safe (91 % both groups). Outpatient women reported feeling less isolated or emotionally alone. Most midwives and doctors (n = 90) agreed that they are more comfortable in sending home a woman with a catheter than prostaglandins and 90 % supported offering outpatient ripening to eligible women.Outpatient balloon catheter ripening should be further investigated as an option for women in an adequately powered randomised trial.Prospectively registered, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612001184864 .
  • No Thumbnail Available
    ItemMetadata only
    Probiotics and human lactational mastitis: a scoping review protocol
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020) Barker, M.; Peters, M.D.J.; Adelson, P.; Steen, M.
    OBJECTIVE:The objective of this scoping review is to identify and examine the evidence on probiotic consumption and its effect on human lactational mastitis. INTRODUCTION:Lactational mastitis is a painful, inflammatory condition of the breast tissue commonly occurring among breastfeeding women. It can lead to decreased breastfeeding rates, which then may lead to poorer maternal and newborn outcomes. There is growing interest and research on the use of probiotics to prevent or treat this condition following promising, but equivocal, evidence from studies of probiotics in relation to animals and other human conditions. INCLUSION CRITERIA:Eligible studies will include women of any age who are planning a pregnancy, pregnant, breastfeeding, or expressing post-childbirth. There will be no exclusion based on comorbidity, previous history, or current diagnosis or treatment of lactational mastitis. All probiotic species and strains and all dosages, preparations, and timing/scheduling of probiotic administration will be eligible for inclusion. All concepts regarding the use of probiotics and their effect on lactational mastitis will be included, and all types of research will be considered. METHODS:This scoping review will follow JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Sources of evidence published in English from 2000 to present will be included. The search will include the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Emcare, in addition to gray literature. A critical appraisal will be performed, and the results will be presented in the final review. A tabular and accompanying narrative summary of the information will be provided.