Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/103521
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Residential location and kidney transplant outcomes in indigenous compared with nonindigenous Australians
Author: Barraclough, K.
Grace, B.
Lawton, P.
McDonald, S.
Citation: Transplantation, 2016; 100(10):2168-2176
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Issue Date: 2016
ISSN: 0041-1337
1534-6080
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Katherine A. Barraclough, Blair S. Grace, Paul Lawton, and Stephen P. McDonald
Abstract: Background. Indigenous Australians experience significantly worse graft and patient outcomes after kidney transplantation compared with nonindigenous Australians. It is unclear whether rural versus urban residential location might contribute to this. Methods. All adult patients from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry who received a kidney transplant in Australia between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, were investigated. Patients' residential location was classified as urban (major city + inner regional) or rural (outer regional - very remote) using the Australian Bureau of Statistics Remoteness Area Classification. Results. Of 7826 kidney transplant recipients, 271 (3%) were indigenous. Sixty-three percent of indigenous Australians lived in rural locations compared with 10% of nonindigenous Australians (P < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, the hazards ratio for graft loss for Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous race was 1.59 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-2.50; P = 0.046). Residential location was not associated with graft survival. Both indigenous race and residential location influenced patient survival, with an adjusted hazards ratio for death of 1.94 (95% CI, 1.23-3.05; P = 0.004) comparing indigenous with nonindigenous and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.01-1.58; P = 0.043) comparing rural with urban recipients. Five-year graft and patient survivals were 70% (95% CI, 60%-78%) and 69% (95% CI, 61%-76%) in rural indigenous recipients compared with 91% (95% CI, 90%-92%) and 92% (95% CI, 91%-93%) in urban nonindigenous recipients. Conclusions. Indigenous kidney transplant recipients experience worse patient and graft survival compared with nonindigenous recipients, whereas rural residential location is associated with patient but not graft survival. Of all groups, indigenous recipients residing in rural locations experienced the lowest 5-year graft and patient survivals.
Keywords: Humans
Creatinine
Kidney Transplantation
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Adolescent
Adult
Middle Aged
Female
Male
Delayed Graft Function
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
Rights: Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001007
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000001007
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.