Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Seasonal recurrence of food bolus obstruction in eosinophilic esophagitis|
|Citation:||Internal Medicine Journal, 2015; 45(9):939-943|
|H. L. Philpott, S. Nandurkar, F. Thien, S. Bloom, E. Lin, R. Goldberg, R. Boyapati, A. Finch, S. G. Royce and P. R. Gibson|
|Abstract:||Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a newly recognised condition that is apparently increasing in prevalence, and the aetiology is poorly understood. The role of aeroallergens in EoE is controversial, given the success of dietary therapy. Massive aeroallergen exposure leading to food bolus obstruction events (FBOE) has been described, and the diagnosis of EoE by esophageal biopsy noted to be more common in the pollen season according to previous case series. Aim: To determine if a seasonal variation and a geographical variation occurred in EoE presenting as FBOE in adults, and to track the prevalence of FBOE and EoE over time. Method: A retrospective case–control study analysis was performed from January 2002 to January 2012 to identify all FBOE in adults presenting to five tertiary hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Endoscopy, histopathological reports, case notes and blood tests were examined, and postcodes recorded. Records of pollen counts were obtained. Cases were defined according to esophageal biopsy and grouped based on month of diagnosis. All other causes of FBOE served as controls. Results: One thousand, one hundred and thirty-two FBOE were identified. Biopsies were only performed in 278 of these cases, and 85 patients were found to have EoE after biopsy. Patients with EoE were younger (mean age 38 years, range 18–72) compared with those with alternative diagnosis (mean age 64.4 range 22–92), more likely to be male (M : F = 4:1 compared with 1.68:1 ) and had a higher eosinophil count in venous blood. Overall no seasonality was demonstrated in FBOE secondary to any diagnosis, although the six cases of recurrent FBOE secondary to EoE mainly occurred in the grass pollen season in subsequent years. FBOE cases were evenly distributed throughout metropolitan Melbourne irrespective of population density. EoE as a percentage of FBOE increased over time. Conclusion: Seasonal aeroallergens may be important for a subgroup of patients with EoE presenting as recurrent FBOE. Esophageal biopsies are performed in a minority of patients, representing a significant departure from ideal management and contributing to recurrent unnecessary FBOE. EoE is an increasingly important cause of FBOE.|
|Keywords:||Food bolus obstruction; food bolus impaction; eosinophilic esophagitis; aeroallergen; season; gastroscopy|
|Rights:||© 2015 Royal Australasian College of Physicians|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 3|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.