Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Systematic review of trial-based analyses reporting the economic impact of heart failure management programs compared with usual care
Author: Maru, S.
Byrnes, J.
Carrington, M.
Stewart, S.
Scuffham, P.
Citation: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2016; 15(1):82-90
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Issue Date: 2016
ISSN: 1474-5151
Statement of
Shoko Maru, Joshua Byrnes, Melinda J Carrington, Simon Stewart and Paul A Scuffham
Abstract: Background: The cost-effectiveness of heart failure management programs (HF-MPs) is highly variable. We explored intervention and clinical characteristics likely to influence cost outcomes. Methods: A systematic review of economic analyses alongside randomized clinical trials comparing HF-MPs and usual care. Electronic databases were searched for English peer-reviewed articles published between 1990 and 2013. Results: Of 511 articles identified, 34 comprising 35 analyses met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen analyses (51%) reported a HF-MP as more effective and less costly; four analyses (11%), and five analyses (14%) also reported they were more effective but with no significant or an increased cost difference, respectively. Alternatively, five analyses (14%) reported no statistically significant difference in effects or costs, and one analysis (3%) reported no statistically significant effect difference but was less costly. Finally, two analyses (6%) reported no statistically significant effect difference but were more costly. Interventions that reduced hospital admissions tended to result in favorable cost outcomes, moderated by increased resource use, intervention cost and/or the durability of the intervention effect. The reporting quality of economic evaluation assessed by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist varied substantially between 5% and 91% (median 45%; 34 articles) of the checklist criteria adequately addressed. Overall, none of the study, patient or intervention characteristics appeared to independently influence the cost-effectiveness of a HF-MP. Conclusion: The extent that HF-MPs reduce hospital readmissions appears to be associated with favorable cost outcomes. The current evidence does not provide a sufficient evidence base to explain what intervention or clinical attributes may influence the cost implications.
Keywords: Heart failure; disease management; cost effectiveness; economic evaluation; healthcare expenditure; hospitalization
Rights: © The European Society of Cardiology 2014 Reprints and permissions:
RMID: 0030087261
DOI: 10.1177/1474515114556031
Grant ID:
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.