Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/119882
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: EPO does not promote interaction between the erythropoietin and beta-common receptors
Author: Cheung Tung Shing, K.S.
Broughton, S.E.
Nero, T.L.
Gillinder, K.
Ilsley, M.D.
Ramshaw, H.
Lopez, A.F.
Griffin, M.D.W.
Parker, M.W.
Perkins, A.C.
Dhagat, U.
Citation: Scientific Reports, 2018; 8(1):12457-1-12457-16
Publisher: Springer Nature
Issue Date: 2018
ISSN: 2045-2322
2045-2322
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Karen S. Cheung Tung Shing, Sophie E. Broughton, Tracy L. Nero, Kevin Gillinder, Melissa D. Ilsley, Hayley Ramshaw, Angel F. Lopez, Michael D. W. Griffin, Michael W. Parker, Andrew C. Perkins, Urmi Dhagat
Abstract: A direct interaction between the erythropoietin (EPOR) and the beta-common (βc) receptors to form an Innate Repair Receptor (IRR) is controversial. On one hand, studies have shown a functional link between EPOR and βc receptor in tissue protection while others have shown no involvement of the βc receptor in tissue repair. To date there is no biophysical evidence to confirm a direct association of the two receptors either in vitro or in vivo. We investigated the existence of an interaction between the extracellular regions of EPOR and the βc receptor in silico and in vitro (either in the presence or absence of EPO or EPO-derived peptide ARA290). Although a possible interaction between EPOR and βc was suggested by our computational and genomic studies, our in vitro biophysical analysis demonstrates that the extracellular regions of the two receptors do not specifically associate. We also explored the involvement of the βc receptor gene (Csf2rb) under anaemic stress conditions and found no requirement for the βc receptor in mice. In light of these studies, we conclude that the extracellular regions of the EPOR and the βc receptor do not directly interact and that the IRR is not involved in anaemic stress.
Rights: © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29865-x
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1036849
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1071897
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1122401
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29865-x
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_119882.pdfPublished Version5.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.