Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/128546
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Conference paper |
Title: | Essential Sentences for Navigating Stack Overflow Answers |
Author: | Nadi, S. Treude, C. |
Citation: | Proceedings of the Euromicro Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR, 2020 / Kontogiannis, K., Khomh, F., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Fokaefs, M.E., Zhou, M. (ed./s), pp.229-239 |
Publisher: | IEEE |
Publisher Place: | online |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
ISBN: | 9781728151434 |
ISSN: | 1534-5351 |
Conference Name: | IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) (18 Feb 2020 - 21 Feb 2020 : London, ON, Canada) |
Editor: | Kontogiannis, K. Khomh, F. Chatzigeorgiou, A. Fokaefs, M.E. Zhou, M. |
Statement of Responsibility: | Sarah Nadi, Christoph Treude |
Abstract: | Stack Overflow (SO) has become an essential resource for software development. Despite its success and prevalence, navigating SO remains a challenge. Ideally, SO users could benefit from highlighted navigational cues that help them decide if an answer is relevant to their task and context. Such navigational cues could be in the form of essential sentences that help the searcher decide whether they want to read the answer or skip over it. In this paper, we compare four potential approaches for identifying essential sentences. We adopt two existing approaches and develop two new approaches based on the idea that contextual information in a sentence (e.g., “if using windows”) could help identify essential sentences. We compare the four techniques using a survey of 43 participants. Our participants indicate that it is not always easy to figure out what the best solution for their specific problem is, given the options, and that they would indeed like to easily spot contextual information that may narrow down the search. Our quantitative comparison of the techniques shows that there is no single technique sufficient for identifying essential sentences that can serve as navigational cues, while our qualitative analysis shows that participants valued explanations and specific conditions, and did not value filler sentences or speculations. Our work sheds light on the importance of navigational cues, and our findings can be used to guide future research to find the best combination of techniques to identify such cues. |
Keywords: | Internet; question answering (information retrieval); software engineering; text analysis; Web sites |
Rights: | © 2020 IEEE |
DOI: | 10.1109/SANER48275.2020.9054828 |
Grant ID: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE180100153 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/saner48275.2020.9054828 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Computer Science publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.