Predictors of Conspiracy Theory Belief: Psychopathological, Socio-Cognitive, and Demographic factors

Date

2018

Authors

Georgiou, Neophytos

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Thesis

Citation

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Belief in conspiracy theories (CTs) has been associated with a range of negative health, civic, and social outcomes. As a result, much of the existing literature has been concerned with identifying the causes of CT belief. However, whilst most research has been preoccupied with debates concerning its causes, it has failed to: a) address the use of problematic methodology derived from convenience sampling, and b) include standardised methods to test for the susceptibility of decision-making biases argued to underline CT beliefs. The aims of the present study were to investigate the validity of psychopathological and socio-cognitive explanations for people’s susceptibility to CT beliefs in a sample drawn from the wider internet community, and to examine whether greater CT belief was associated to cognitive biases such as the Jumping-to-Conclusions (JTC) bias, and Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence (BADE). A cross-sectional correlational design was employed in which a sample of 375 participants completed a battery of psychological assessments. This included measures of psychopathological, socio-cognitive, and demographic factors, along with two measures of CT belief. Participants subsequently completed two tasks which captured the JTC bias and BADE. Individuals who held high CT belief were more likely to exhibit psychopathological tendencies, and in turn were less likely to engage in analytical thinking, rendering them more susceptible to the BADE and JTC bias. Future research should endeavour to investigate the contribution of other at-risk mental states that cause psychopathological tendencies (i.e. delusion-proneness) that are associated to CT belief, and further replicate the findings of prior literature which applied problematic methodology.

School/Discipline

School of Psychology

Dissertation Note

Thesis (B.PsychSc(Hons)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2018

Provenance

This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals

Description

This item is only available electronically.

Access Status

Rights

License

Grant ID

Published Version

Call number

Persistent link to this record