Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Factors contributing to exercise intolerance in patients with atrial fibrillation|
|Citation:||Heart Lung and Circulation, 2021; 30(7):947-954|
|Adrian D. Elliott, Christian V. Verdicchio, Celine Gallagher, Dominik Linz, Rajiv Mahajan, Ricardo Mishima|
|Abstract:||Background: Reduced exercise capacity and exercise intolerance are commonly reported by individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). Our objectives were to evaluate the contributing factors to reduced exercise capacity and describe the association between subjective measures of exercise intolerance versus objective measures of exercise capacity. Methods: Two hundred and three (203) patients with non-permanent AF and preserved ejection fraction undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were recruited. Clinical characteristics, AF-symptom evaluation, and transthoracic echocardiography measures were collected. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) was calculated during CPET as an objective measure of exercise capacity. We assessed the impact of 16 pre-defined clinical features, comorbidities and cardiac functional parameters on VO2peak. Results: Across this cohort (Age 66±11 years, 40.4% female and 32% in AF), the mean VO2peak was 20.3±6.3 mL/kg/min. 24.9% of patients had a VO2peak considered low (<16 mL/kg/min). In multivariable analysis, echocardiography-derived estimates of elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (E/E’) and reduced chronotropic index were significantly associated with lower VO2peak. The presence of AF at the time of testing was not significantly associated with VO2peak but was associated with elevated minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production indicating impaired ventilatory efficiency. There was a poor association between VO2peak and subjectively reported exercise intolerance and exertional dyspnoea. Conclusion: Reduced exercise capacity in AF patients is associated with elevated LV filling pressure and reduced chronotropic response rather than rhythm status. Subjectively reported exercise intolerance is not a sensitive assessment of reduced exercise capacity. These findings have important implications for understanding reduced exercise capacity amongst AF patients and the approach to management in this cohort. (ACTRN12619001343190).|
|Keywords:||Exercise; arrhythmia; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; heart rate; dyspnoea|
|Rights:||© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society ofAustralia and New Zealand (CSANZ)|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 8|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.