Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/136268
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScheiblhofer, E.-
dc.contributor.authorMoser, U.-
dc.contributor.authorLӧhr, S.-
dc.contributor.authorWilmsen, M.-
dc.contributor.authorFarkaš, J.-
dc.contributor.authorGallhofer, D.-
dc.contributor.authorBäckström, A.M.-
dc.contributor.authorZack, T.-
dc.contributor.authorBaldermann, A.-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationMinerals, 2022; 12(7):818-1-818-19-
dc.identifier.issn2075-163X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/136268-
dc.description.abstractThe scarcity of well-preserved and directly dateable sedimentary sequences is a major impediment to inferring the Earth’s paleo-environmental evolution. The authigenic mineral glauconite can potentially provide absolute stratigraphic ages for sedimentary sequences and constraints on paleo-depositional conditions. This requires improved approaches for measuring and interpreting glauconite formation ages. Here, glauconite from a Cretaceous shelfal sequence (Langenstein, northern Germany) was characterized using petrographical, geochemical (EMP), andmineralogical (XRD) screening methods before in situ Rb-Sr dating via LA-ICP-MS/MS. The obtained glauconite ages (~101 to 97 Ma) partly overlap with the depositional age of the Langenstein sequence (±3 Ma), but without the expected stratigraphic age progression, which we attribute to detrital and diagenetic illitic phase impurities inside the glauconites. Using a novel age deconvolution approach, which combines the new Rb-Sr dataset with published K-Ar ages, we recalculate the glauconite bulk ages to obtain stratigraphically significant ‘pure’ glauconite ages (~100 to 96 Ma). Thus, our results show that pristine ages can be preserved in mineralogically complex glauconite grains even under burial diagenetic conditions (T < 65 ◦C; <1500 m depth), confirming that glauconite could be a suitable archive for paleo-environmental reconstructions and direct sediment dating.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityEsther Scheiblhofer, Ulrike Moser, Stefan Löhr, Markus Wilmsen, Juraj Farkaš, Daniela Gallhofer, Alice Matsdotter Bäckström, Thomas Zack, and Andre Baldermann-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/)-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/min12070818-
dc.subjectglauconite; radiometric dating; in situ Rb-Sr geochronology; diagenesis; illitization; LA-ICP-MS/MS-
dc.titleRevisiting Glauconite Geochronology: Lessons Learned from In Situ Radiometric Dating of a Glauconite-Rich Cretaceous Shelfal Sequence-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/min12070818-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP210100462-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Earth and Environmental Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_136268.pdfPublished version25.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.