Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/39375
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThompson, J.-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationHuman Fertility: an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 2005; 8(2):69-70-
dc.identifier.issn1464-7273-
dc.identifier.issn1742-8149-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/39375-
dc.description.abstractRegulation of ART in Australia consists of a mixed bag of Federal and State legislation and a national regulatory authority involved in accreditation. Access to IVF technology is variable between states and much ethical debate surrounds issues such as 'social sexing' and other access differences, as well as the fate of surplus embryos. Little public debate on restriction of multiple embryo transfer practices has occurred, most likely due to public ignorance of the associated health risks.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJeremy G. Thompson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14647270500030621-
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectlegislation-
dc.subjectregulation-
dc.subjectresearch-
dc.subjectembryo-
dc.titleA mixed bag: A perspective on the regulation of IVF in Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14647270500030621-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidThompson, J. [0000-0003-4941-7731]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.