Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/46229
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBiddulph, T.-
dc.contributor.authorPlummer, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSetter, T.-
dc.contributor.authorMares, D.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationField Crops Research, 2008; 107(2):116-128-
dc.identifier.issn0378-4290-
dc.identifier.issn1872-6852-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/46229-
dc.description.abstractPreharvest sprouting occurs following rainfall after maturity and reduces grain quality and value. Dormancy at maturity is a trait frequently used by wheat breeders to improve tolerance to sprouting. To determine the environmental influence on the predicative relationship between dormancy at maturity and improved preharvest sprouting tolerance, dormancy (germination index) at maturity and grain quality (falling number) at maturity and then, after rainfall, was measured over three seasons. Based on the results it was possible to draw three main conclusions. Firstly, genotypes with strong dormancy (germination index <0.20) which have the embryo and seed coat component of dormancy maintained a falling number >300 s at all sites and seasons for the 2-month period after maturity despite receiving up to 122 mm of rain. Adequate preharvest sprouting tolerance also occurred in dormant genotypes, with just the embryo component; in all but the most severe conditions. Secondly, though the effect of environment and interaction of genotype and environment was significant, the G by E interaction did not account for a large proportion of the variation (<6%) in sprouting tolerance (measured by falling number after rainfall) or change the relative rankings of preharvest sprouting tolerance. Finally, other defects associated with rainfall during grain filling such as black point and fungal staining may slightly reduce dormancy estimates and preharvest sprouting tolerance. For this reason grain defects need to be improved in parallel with preharvest sprouting tolerance. In conclusion, strong dormancy provides a reliable source of preharvest sprouting tolerance in the field. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityT.B. Biddulph, J.A. Plummer, T.L. Setter and D.J. Mares-
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/503308/description#description-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier Science BV-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.01.003-
dc.subjectPreharvest sprouting-
dc.subjectDormancy-
dc.subjectGermination index-
dc.subjectFalling number-
dc.subjectFungal staining-
dc.subjectBlack point-
dc.titleSeasonal conditions influence dormancy and preharvest sprouting tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the field-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fcr.2008.01.003-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMares, D. [0000-0002-8165-8140]-
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications
Aurora harvest 6

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.