Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/57321
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Barbaraen
dc.contributor.authorInnes, John Michaelen
dc.date.issued2005en
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Psychologist, 2005; 40(3):159-169en
dc.identifier.issn0005-0067en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/57321-
dc.description© 2005 Australian Psychological Society Ltd.en
dc.description.abstractCurrent Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) imperatives for generic skills and quality constitute a challenge for university teaching. There is an increasing recognition in higher education that this challenge cannot be adequately addressed by a top-down approach but requires bottom-up integration of generic skills in curricula. Psychology has long claimed that the very nature of our discipline provides our graduates with a wealth of transferable skills and perhaps assumed that our science identity and the profession's commitment to self-regulation provide adequate testament to the quality of our programmes. There is however, evidence of room for improvement and it is argued that in positively addressing the generic skills challenge, we can improve student outcomes in our undergraduate programmes.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityBarbara Kennedy & Michael Innesen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAustralian Psychological Socen
dc.titleThe teaching of psychology in the contemporary university: Beyond the accreditation guidelinesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.schoolHumanities & Social Sciences Officeen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00050060500243467en
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.