Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Web of Science®
|Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases
|Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010; 14(8):357-364
|Elsevier Science London
|Thomas L. Griffiths, Nick Chater, Charles Kemp, Amy Perfors and Joshua B. Tenenbaum
|Cognitive science aims to reverse-engineer the mind, and many of the engineering challenges the mind faces involve induction. The probabilistic approach to modeling cognition begins by identifying ideal solutions to these inductive problems. Mental processes are then modeled using algorithms for approximating these solutions, and neural processes are viewed as mechanisms for implementing these algorithms, with the result being a top-down analysis of cognition starting with the function of cognitive processes. Typical connectionist models, by contrast, follow a bottom-up approach, beginning with a characterization of neural mechanisms and exploring what macro-level functional phenomena might emerge. We argue that the top-down approach yields greater flexibility for exploring the representations and inductive biases that underlie human cognition.
Predictive Value of Tests
|© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
|Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.