Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/61981
Type: Thesis
Title: South Australian Aborigines Protection Board (1939-1962) and governance through ’scientific’ expertise: a genealogy of protection and assimilation.
Author: Macilwain, Margaret
Issue Date: 2007
School/Discipline: School of History and Politics : Politics
Abstract: This thesis offers a Foucaultian genealogy of the government policies of protection and assimilation as they affected Aborigines in South Australia up to the 1960s. The central actor in the thesis is the Aborigines Protection Board (1939-1962) because the Board signalled a shift in the form of liberal governance to include 'scientific' experts in the governance of Aboriginal people. Executive 'scientific' experts were appointed from the areas of medicine, protection of women, anthropology, mission organisation, agriculture and education, and in the process a 'two-way street' of expertise was created whereby government drew 'scientific' experts into its structure through networks with University organisations, and bureaucrats infiltrated the Univeristy. As a result, the experts' knowledges created a biopolitcs, which determined methods of governance of Aboriginal people. Government used the rhetoric of 'scientific expertise' both to problematise Aboriginal affairs in ways to make them amenable to governance, and to condone non-liberal practices in this area. Older disciplinary and pastoral techniques based upon 'hybrid' knowledges - a combination of personal experience of the job and 'scientific" knowledge-persisted.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of History and Politics, 2007
Keywords: South Australia aborigines’ protection board; aboriginal Australians cultural assimilation South Australia; aboriginal Australians government policy South Australia; aboriginal Australians social conditions South Australia
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exception. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available or If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals.
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf 39.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf35.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.