Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/75346
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gidley, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kravchuk, O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nottingham, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | D'arcy, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gidley, M. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2009; 52(2):164-172 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0925-5214 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-2356 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/75346 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A new method for measuring fruit-to-fruit variation in strawberries by both sensory and instrumental analyses was developed and applied. The method allowed quantification of fruit-to-fruit variation in sensory attributes and instrumental properties. Two commercial colour gradings (3/4 and 4/4 red) of strawberry commonly used at harvest were investigated. In the main experiment, one-half of a strawberry fruit was assessed for sensory characteristics by a trained panel while the other half was concurrently individually evaluated for soluble solids content (SSC), pH, titratable acidity (TA), firmness, and headspace volatile composition. The sensory evaluation was additionally performed on a bulk purée of fruit from the same harvest and the results were compared with the sensory evaluation on individual fruit. This study suggests that fruit-to-fruit variation is substantial in SSC, TA and fruit firmness and sensory characteristics such as 'fruity odour', 'sweet flavour' and 'flavour aftertaste', whereas other characteristics show similar variation among panellists for both individual fruit and bulk purée analyses. Further, individual fruit flavour characteristics were correlated with fruit biophysical properties. The results obtained are specific to this study and further investigations need to be undertaken to validate this method as a model for fruit-to-fruit variation in small fruit. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Purnima Gunnessa, Olena Kravchukb, Stephen M. Nottinghamc, Bruce R. D’Arcyb, Michael J. Gidleya | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Science BV | - |
dc.rights | © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.006 | - |
dc.subject | Fruit-to-fruit variation | - |
dc.subject | Flavour volatiles | - |
dc.subject | Biophysical analysis | - |
dc.subject | Fragaria ananassa Duch. | - |
dc.subject | Variance components analysis | - |
dc.subject | Sensory analysis | - |
dc.title | Sensory analysis of individual strawberry fruit and comparison with instrumental analysis | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.006 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Kravchuk, O. [0000-0001-5291-3600] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Agriculture, Food and Wine publications Aurora harvest |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.