Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/76205
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Standard setting of script concordance tests using an adapted Nedelsky approach
Author: Linn, A.
Tonkin, A.
Duggan, P.
Citation: Medical Teacher, 2013; 35(4):314-319
Publisher: Carfax Publishing
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 0142-159X
0142-159X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Andrew M.J. Linn, Anne Tonkin & Paul Duggan
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Standard setting in assessment seeks to apply meaning of achievement to an assessment score. Appropriate standard setting for script concordance tests (SCTs) remains a challenge, with existing methods representing norm-referenced approaches. AIMS: To develop a criterion-referenced standard setting approach for SCT using an adapted Nedelsky approach, to pilot feasibility, and to compare failure rates with two other methods. METHODS: Second- and third-year medical students were administered a 45-question SCT and results collated. Standard setting was applied using three approaches: (1) norm-referenced (student cohorts), (2) expert-referenced (student cohort compared to expert mean), and (3) adapted Nedelsky approach using answer key normalization. Feasibility and failure rates were measured. RESULTS: All standard setting approaches were feasible, with 60 additional minutes required for the Nedelsky standard setting exercise. Failure rates between the three approaches were similar (Year 2: 8.0–9.8% and Year 3: 2.1–7.6%), with the adapted Nedelsky approach representing an intermediate option (Year 2: 8.0% and Year 3: 3.5%). CONCLUSION: Standard setting SCT using the criterion-referenced method of an adapted Nedelsky approach was found to be both logically justifiable and logistically simple, and produced failure rates comparable to other currently utilized and less objective approaches.
Keywords: Humans; Feasibility Studies; Achievement; Education, Medical, Undergraduate; Educational Measurement
Rights: © 2012 Informa UK Ltd.
RMID: 0020125369
DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2012.746446
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_76205.pdfRestricted Access547.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.