Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/76439
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: An analysis of the cost of validating semantic composability
Author: Szabo, C.
Teo, Y.
Citation: Journal of Simulation, 2012; 6(3):152-163
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Issue Date: 2012
ISSN: 1747-7778
1747-7786
Statement of
Responsibility: 
C Szabo and YM Teo
Abstract: Validation of semantic composability is a non-trivial problem and a key step in component-based modelling and simulation. Recent work in semantic composability validation promises to reduce verification, validation, and accreditation efforts. However, the underlying cost of current validation approaches can undermine the promised benefits, and the trade-off between validation accuracy and validation cost is not well understood. In this paper we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first quantitative study on the cost of validating semantic composability. Our study covers four representative validation approaches, including two DEVS-based methods, Petty and Weisel formal validation, and deny-validity, and for simplicity, we use computation time as a measure of validation cost. For a queueing model with 1000 components, there is significant trade-off between validation accuracy and cost, with the time-based deny-validity costing seven times that of timeless Petty and Weisel formalism.
Keywords: validation
cost
composability
Rights: © 2012 Operational Research Society Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1057/jos.2012.11
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Computer Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.