Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/79045
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Li, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yong, T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hakendorf, P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ben-Tovim, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, C. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2013; 19(1):76-79 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-1294 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2753 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/79045 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h4>Rationale, aims and objectives</h4>To determine the relation of the readmission rate of general medical patients to either the existence of a discharge summary or the timeliness of its dispatch.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a retrospective study on discharge summaries of all discharges from the general medical service at a tertiary referral teaching hospital from January 2005 to December 2009. The main outcome measures were readmission rate to hospital within 7 or 28 days of discharge<h4>Results</h4>A total of 16 496 patient admissions were included in the analysis. Of these discharges, 3397 (20.6%) patients did not have a summary completed within a week of discharge. There were significant linear trends between patients' readmission rates within 7 (P < 0.001) or 28 days (P < 0.001) and categories reflecting the delay in dispatch of their discharge summaries. The absence of a discharge summary was associated with a 79% increase in the rate of readmission within 7 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 42 to 124% increase; P < 0.001] and a 37% increased rate of readmission within 28 days (95% CI 17 to 61% increase; P < 0.001). If aged less than 80 years, the absence of a discharge summary was associated with a 127% increase in readmission rate within 7 days (95% CI 72 to 202% increase; P < 0.001) and a 55% increase within 28 days (95% CI 25 to 91% increase; P < 0.001) after discharge.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Delayed transmission or absence of a discharge summary is associated with readmission of the patient; more so in patients less than 80 years old. If no summary is generated by 7 days after discharge, the rate of readmission within 7 or 28 days after discharge is indistinguishable from no summary being written at all. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Jordan Y. Z. Li, Tuck Y. Yong, Paul Hakendorf, David Ben-Tovim and Campbell H. Thompson | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Science Ltd | - |
dc.rights | © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01772.x | - |
dc.subject | discharge summary | - |
dc.subject | general medicine | - |
dc.subject | readmission rate | - |
dc.title | Timeliness in discharge summary dissemination is associated with patients' clinical outcomes | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01772.x | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Thompson, C. [0000-0002-5164-3327] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Medicine publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.