Current opinion on optimal treatment for colorectal cancer
Date
2013
Authors
Price, T.
Segelov, E.
Burge, M.
Haller, D.
Ackland, S.
Tebbutt, N.
Karapetis, C.
Pavlakis, N.
Sobrero, A.
Cunningham, D.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 2013; 13(5):597-611
Statement of Responsibility
Timothy J Price, Eva Segelov, Matthew Burge, Daniel G Haller, Stephen P Ackland, Niall C Tebbutt, Christos S Karapetis, Nick Pavlakis, Alberto F Sobrero, David Cunningham and Jeremy D Shapiro
Conference Name
Abstract
The medical treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved greatly in the last 10 years, involving complex combined chemotherapy protocols and, in more recent times, new biologic agents. Advances in adjuvant therapy have been limited to the addition of oxaliplatin and the substitution of oral fluoropyrimidine (e.g., capecitabine) for intravenous 5-fluorouracil with no evidence for improved outcome with biological agents. Clinical benefit from the use of the targeted monoclonal antibodies, bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab, in the treatment of metastatic CRC is now well established, but the optimal timing of their use requires careful consideration to derive the maximal benefit. Evidence to date suggests potentially distinct roles for bevacizumab and EGF receptor-targeted biological agents (cetuximab and panitumumab) in the treatment of metastatic CRC. This article reviews the evidence in support of modern treatments for CRC and the decision-making behind the treatment choices, their benefits and toxicities.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2013 Expert Reviews Ltd.