Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/80190
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKleemann, S.-
dc.contributor.authorGill, G.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationWeed Science, 2013; 61(2):222-229-
dc.identifier.issn0043-1745-
dc.identifier.issn1550-2759-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/80190-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Ripgut brome is a difficult weed to manage in cereal crops of southern Australia because only a few herbicides can provide effective control in cereals. Knowledge of seed-dormancy mechanisms, germination ecology, and emergence behavior in the field could facilitate development of effective weed control programs for this weed species. Ripgut brome populations from cropping fields were found to possess much longer seed dormancy than that reported previously in the literature. Furthermore, some ripgut brome populations from cropping fields showed longer seed dormancy than those collected from adjacent noncropped fence lines. For example, all seeds of one of the populations from the fence line (SA-1F) germinated at 3 mo after maturity, whereas seeds from the cropping field at the same site (SA-1C) showed little germination (&lt; 3%) even at 8 mo after maturity. These highly dormant ripgut brome populations from cropping fields were responsive to cold stratification, with germination increasing significantly after 2 to 14 d of exposure. Germination of dormant ripgut brome populations increased with addition of gibberellic acid (0.001 M GA<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>), particularly when lemma and palea had been removed. Ripgut brome populations from cropping fields (VIC-2C and SA-1C) showed strong inhibition of seed germination when exposed to light. These differences in seed dormancy among ripgut brome populations were also expressed in seedling emergence pattern in the field. The nondormant populations collected from fence lines showed high seedling establishment (&gt; 80%) during autumn, which coincided with the planting time of winter crops in southern Australia. In contrast, five populations from cropping fields showed much lower seedling establishment (3 to 17%) before the time of crop planting. Delayed seedling establishment in populations from cropping fields could lead to less effective preseeding weed control and higher weed infestations in field crops. Results of this study also showed that the seedbank of these highly dormant ripgut brome populations can readily persist from one year to the next. Effective management of ripgut brome populations with long seed dormancy and increased seedbank persistence would require a major change in cropping systems used by the growers in southern Australia.</jats:p>-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySamuel George Lloyd Kleemann and Gurjeet Singh Gill-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWeed Sci Soc Amer-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-12-00083.1-
dc.subjectCold stratification-
dc.subjectgibberellic acid-
dc.subjectlight-
dc.subjectseedbank persistence-
dc.titleSeed dormancy and seedling emergence in ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus) populations in southern Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1614/WS-D-12-00083.1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGill, G. [0000-0002-3773-8100]-
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications
Aurora harvest

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.