Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Controversies regarding cervical incompetence, short cervix, and the need for cerclage|
|Citation:||Clinics in Perinatology, 2004; 31(4):695-720|
|Publisher:||W B Saunders Co|
|Abstract:||Cervical incompetence (CI) is not an all or nothing phenomenon but a continuous variable. CI and preterm labor are not distinct entities but rather part of a spectrum leading to preterm delivery. Cervical length (CL) is an independent variable in the prediction of preterm delivery, to which it is inversely related. Application of a primary transvaginal cervical cerclage appears to be an unnecessary intervention in about 50% of women presenting with a history suggesting cervical incompetence. A better alternative for women with a history of or risk factors for CI is transvaginal ultrasonographic follow-up of CL. To facilitate the comparison of studies of CI, the authors suggest a nomenclature reflecting the different stages of prevention: primary, secondary, and tertiary transvaginal cervical cerclage.|
Uterine Cervical Incompetence
Obstetric Labor, Premature
|Description:||Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Inc.|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest|
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.