Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/88995
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHasterok, D.-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, D.S.-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research, 2007; 112(B6):B06415-1-B06415-16-
dc.identifier.issn0148-0227-
dc.identifier.issn2169-9356-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/88995-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Continental elevations can be partitioned into contributions from thermal and compositional buoyancy and geodynamic forces. In order to isolate the thermal component, elevations of 36 North American tectonic provinces are adjusted for the effects of compositional thickness and density variations by computing an isostatic adjustment relative to a standard crustal section (2850 kg m<jats:sup>−3</jats:sup> density and 39 km thickness). Crustal densities are estimated using an empirical velocity‐density relationship. Compositional elevation adjustments applied to North American provinces range from ∼−1100 m in the southern Rocky Mountains to 2300 m in the Gulf of California, with uncertainties ranging from ∼200 m to &gt;600 m. Theoretical thermal buoyancy is estimated by integrating the difference between a geotherm derived from observed values of heat flow and a reference geotherm. The best fitting continental heat flow–elevation model has a reference heat flow of 46.6 mW m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> at 0 km and a 60:40 partitioning of surface heat flow between reduced and upper crustal radiogenic heat flow. Raw elevations of continental provinces show little correlation with heat flow, while compositionally adjusted elevations show a clear trend with ∼3 km difference between hot and cold provinces. A continental heat flow–elevation plot is used to identify outliers in adjusted province elevations. Anomalous elevations may reflect a nonsteady state thermal regime, dynamically supported elevation, anomalous mantle, or some combination of these states. Discriminating between these elevation sources provides insight into the geodynamics of North America, demonstrating the usefulness of this approach in continental geodynamic studies.</jats:p>-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDerrick Hasterok, and David S. Chapman-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union-
dc.rightsCopyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jb004664-
dc.subjectthermal isostasy; continental elevation; North America-
dc.titleContinental thermal isostasy: 2. Application to North America-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2006JB004664-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidHasterok, D. [0000-0002-8257-7975]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Geology & Geophysics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.