Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Nutritional adequacy of goat milk infant formulas for term infants: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
Author: Zhou, S.
Sullivan, T.
Gibson, R.
Loennerdal, B.
Prosser, C.
Lowry, D.
Makrides, M.
Citation: The British Journal of Nutrition: an international journal of nutritional science, 2014; 111(9):1641-1651
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 0007-1145
Statement of
Shao J. Zhou, Thomas Sullivan, Robert A. Gibson, Bo Lo, nnerdal, Colin G. Prosser, Dianne J. Lowry, and Maria Makrides
Abstract: The safety and nutritional adequacy of goat milk infant formulas have been questioned. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the growth and nutritional status of infants fed a goat milk infant formula with those of infants fed a typical whey-based cow milk infant formula. The secondary aim was to examine a range of health- and allergy-related outcomes. A double-blind, randomised controlled trial with 200 formula-fed term infants randomly assigned to receive either goat or cow milk formula from 2 weeks to at least 4 months of age was conducted. A cohort of 101 breast-fed infants was included for comparison. Weight, length and head circumference were measured at 2 weeks and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 months of age. Nutritional status was assessed from serum albumin, urea, creatinine, Hb, ferritin, and folate and plasma amino acid concentrations at 4 months. Z-scores for weight, length, head circumference and weight for length were not different between the two formula-fed groups. There were differences in the values of some amino acids and blood biomarkers between the formula-fed groups, but the mean values for biomarkers were within the normal reference range. There were no differences in the occurrence of serious adverse events, general health, and incidence of dermatitis or medically diagnosed food allergy. The incidence of parentally reported blood-stained stools was higher in the goat milk formula-fed group, although this was a secondary outcome and its importance is unclear. Goat milk formula provided growth and nutritional outcomes in infants that did not differ from those provided by a standard whey-based cow milk formula.
Keywords: Milk
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
Food Hypersensitivity
Biological Markers
Cohort Studies
Double-Blind Method
Child Development
Nutritional Status
Nutritive Value
Term Birth
Infant Formula
Infant, Newborn
South Australia
Rights: © The Authors 2013
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513004212
Grant ID:
Published version:
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications
Aurora harvest 7

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_89630.pdfSubmitted version449.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.