Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/90937
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSingla, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBroadbridge, V.en
dc.contributor.authorMittinty, M.en
dc.contributor.authorBeeke, C.en
dc.contributor.authorMaddern, G.en
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Rural Health, 2014; 22(5):249-256en
dc.identifier.issn1038-5282en
dc.identifier.issn1440-1584en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/90937-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Previous Australian studies have suggested poorer survival of patients with colorectal cancer in remote areas. To date no studies have assessed the geographic disparity in patients with metastatic disease. This retrospective cohort study looks at geographic differences in the surgical care and survival of patients with metastatic colorectal disease. The paper utilises data from the South Australian Clinical Registry for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (SACRMCC). DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on patients' socio-economic status, primary and metastatic tumour characteristics, treatment and survival was extracted from the SACRMCC database. A binomial model analysis was used to identify geographical differences in the surgical treatment of patients and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify any geographic differences in survival. RESULTS: The findings showed no differences in the diagnosis of liver metastases or provision of liver surgery between geographic areas, however there was a reduced likelihood of liver surgery with increasing age. The median overall survival rate, from the date of diagnosis of metastatic disease, was 20.0 months and the distribution by geographic remoteness was 19.1 months, 20.2 months, 22.0 months and 20.4 months in Major Cities, Inner Regional, Outer Regional and Remote areas respectively. This was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was no evidence of a geographical disparity in the diagnosis, surgical treatment or survival in metastatic colorectal cancer. This may be due to the shift toward centralising surgical care in South Australia. Nevertheless, there remains a need to improve the uptake of surgical care in the growing elderly population.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityApresh Singla, Vy Broadbridge, Murthy Mittinty, Carol Beeke and Guy J. Maddernen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.rights© 2014 National Rural Health Alliance Incen
dc.subjectoncology; remote health; rural oncology; rurality; therapeuticsen
dc.titleRural populations have equal surgical and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal canceren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030013217en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajr.12133en
dc.identifier.pubid136917-
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS08en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMittinty, M. [0000-0001-8778-9793]en
dc.identifier.orcidMaddern, G. [0000-0003-2064-181X]en
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.