Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries|
|Citation:||Lancet, 2016; 387(10019):691-702|
|Vicki Flenady ... Philippa Middleton ... T Yee Khong ... et al. for The Lancet Ending Preventable Stillbirths study group and The Lancet Stillbirths In High-Income Countries Investigator Group|
|Abstract:||Variation in stillbirth rates across high-income countries and large equity gaps within high-income countries persist. If all high-income countries achieved stillbirth rates equal to the best performing countries, 19,439 late gestation (28 weeks or more) stillbirths could have been avoided in 2015. The proportion of unexplained stillbirths is high and can be addressed through improvements in data collection, investigation, and classification, and with a better understanding of causal pathways. Substandard care contributes to 20-30% of all stillbirths and the contribution is even higher for late gestation intrapartum stillbirths. National perinatal mortality audit programmes need to be implemented in all high-income countries. The need to reduce stigma and fatalism related to stillbirth and to improve bereavement care are also clear, persisting priorities for action. In high-income countries, a woman living under adverse socioeconomic circumstances has twice the risk of having a stillborn child when compared to her more advantaged counterparts. Programmes at community and country level need to improve health in disadvantaged families to address these inequities.|
|Rights:||Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.