Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/99838
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNash, L.-
dc.contributor.authorDixon, R.-
dc.contributor.authorEaton, V.-
dc.contributor.authorGrzeskowiak, L.-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2015; 55(6):547-551-
dc.identifier.issn0004-8666-
dc.identifier.issn1479-828X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/99838-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pregnancy hand-held records (PHR) are a personally controlled health record utilised in the promotion of continuity of care across pregnancy by providing a single resource for the recording of pregnancy-related health information. Aims: To determine the accuracy of the PHR in relation to information on medications and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to examine the frequency and nature of any identified discrepancies. Materials and Methods: A 12-week prospective clinical audit of 300 women admitted to either the antenatal or postnatal ward at a tertiary-level maternity hospital. A detailed medication history was completed for each woman by a pharmacist, with women interviewed about medication use prior to and during their pregnancy as well as any ADRs. The medication history and PHR were compared to identify discrepancies. Results: Medication discrepancies were extremely common, with 254 (84.7%; 95% CI 80.6–88.8%) women having at least one or more medication-related discrepancy involving 686 (55%; 95% CI 52.2–57.8%) prescription and nonprescription medications. Most common reasons for prescription medication discrepancies included the medication details being incomplete (44%), missing (29%) or incorrect (17%). ADRs and allergy discrepancies were also common, identified among 59 (20%; 95% CI 15.5–24.5%) women. Conclusions: The PHR is of low accuracy in relation to the recording of medications and ADRs. This warrants further research to examine the impact of these discrepancies on patient care and outcomes. The identification of strategies for improving the recording of information on medications and ADRs in the PHR is also required.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLauren Nash, Rowena Dixon, Vaughn Eaton, Luke E Grzeskowiak-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.relation.isreplacedby2440/111000-
dc.relation.isreplacedbyhttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/111000-
dc.rights© 2015 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12371-
dc.subjectHospital-
dc.subjectmedication errors-
dc.subjectperinatal care-
dc.subjectpharmacy service-
dc.subjectpregnancy-
dc.subjectsafety-
dc.titleAccuracy of information on medication use and adverse drug reactions recorded in pregnancy hand-held records-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajo.12371-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1070421-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidGrzeskowiak, L. [0000-0001-8554-4696]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_99838.pdfAccepted Version419.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.