Considering the evidence : what counts as the best evidence for the post harvest management of split thickness skin graft donor sites?

dc.contributor.author	Wiechula, Richard John	en
dc.contributor.school	Dept. of Clinical Nursing	en
dc.date.issued	2004	en
dc.description.dissertation	Thesis (D.Nurs.) -- University of Adelaide, Dept. of Clinical Nursing, 2004	en
dc.format.extent	101837 bytes	en
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2440/38207
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.provenance	Copyright material removed from digital thesis. See print copy in University of Adelaide Library for full text.
dc.provenance	This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exception. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available or If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
dc.subject.lcsh	Systematic reviews (Medical research); Skin Wounds and injuries Treatment; Skin-grafting	en
dc.title	Considering the evidence : what counts as the best evidence for the post harvest management of split thickness skin graft donor sites?	en
dc.type	Thesis	en

Files

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3