Low voter turnout in the United States - Is compulsory voting a viable solution?

dc.contributor.authorHill, L.
dc.date.issued2006
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2006 by SAGE Publications
dc.description.abstractAmerica’s turnout problem is among the worst of any of the established democracies. Even a reform as sweeping as the NVRA (Motor Voter Act) has failed to remedy it. Adopting an empirically informed normative approach, the author proposes and defends an ambitious solution: compulsory voting. Anticipating considerable resistance to this proposal, the article explores likely cultural, practical, political and legal barriers to its introduction and, in some cases, suggests strategies for overcoming them. It is concluded that most of the likely impediments are not technically, but rather, culturally and politically intractable. Yet, compulsory voting could have many benefits. Not only could it improve turnout more effectively than any other measure, but it could also close America’s yawning SES voting gap, limit some of the problems associated with campaign finance and break the cycle of low efficacy, alienation, non-participation and exclusion that characterizes American politics. Finally, compulsory voting can serve and protect such important democratic values as representativeness, legitimacy and political equality.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLisa Hill
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Theoretical Politics, 2006; 18(2):207-232
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0951629806061868
dc.identifier.issn0951-6298
dc.identifier.issn1460-3667
dc.identifier.orcidHill, L. [0000-0002-9098-7800]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/22995
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.source.urihttp://jtp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/2/207
dc.titleLow voter turnout in the United States - Is compulsory voting a viable solution?
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files