Elicitation of irrigators' risk preferences from observed behaviour

Files

RA_hdl_101433.pdf (280.34 KB)
  (Restricted Access)

Date

2016

Authors

Nauges, C.
Wheeler, S.
Zuo, A.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2016; 60(3):442-458

Statement of Responsibility

Céline Nauges, Sarah Ann Wheeler, Alec Zuo

Conference Name

Abstract

Water trading in the Murray-Darling Basin of Australia has developed to the point where it is a common adaptation tool used by irrigators, making it an apt case study to elicit the marginal value of irrigation water and irrigators' risk preferences in two key industries with differing levels of water dependence. Our data come from large-scale and representative surveys of irrigated broadacre and horticultural farms in the Murray–Darling Basin over a 6-year period. The marginal contribution of irrigation water to profit is estimated at $547 and $61/ML on average in horticulture and broadacre, respectively. Horticultural irrigators are found to be averse to the risk of large losses (downside risk) while broadacre irrigators are averse to the variability (variance) of profit.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Data source: Supporting information, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12134 Link to a related website: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/292458/files/ajar12134.pdf, Open Access via Unpaywall

Access Status

Rights

© 2015 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record