Effect of soil anisotropy and variability on the stability of undrained soil slope

Files

fbuil-09-1117858.pdf (2.98 MB)
  (Published version)

Date

2023

Authors

Nguyen, H.B.K.
Rahman, M.M.
Karim, M.R.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Frontiers in Built Environment, 2023; 9(1117858)

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

<jats:p>Soil is a naturally heterogeneous material and can show significant spatial variation in strength and other properties. For silty and clayey soils, these variations are often more pronounced. Despite such variation, many past studies considered these soils as homogeneous and only considered a single set of soil parameters. This may lead to underestimation of the failure potential of geo-structure such as natural slopes, water retaining dams, retaining walls, <jats:italic>etc.</jats:italic> A finite element method considering soil variability should be an ideal tool to investigate the behaviour of these soils. This study adopted a 2D random finite element method to evaluate the effect of such variability on slope stability. The spatial variability was implemented by using the coefficient of variation (<jats:italic>COV</jats:italic>) and the spatial correlation length (<jats:italic>θ</jats:italic>) for cohesion. It was found that the soil slope with higher <jats:italic>COV</jats:italic> would have a higher chance of failure, whereas the soil slope with less <jats:italic>COV</jats:italic> might not show any failure. In addition, the soil with a higher <jats:italic>θ</jats:italic>, in general, show less potential of failure. In the literature, most studies considered an isotropic condition for the soil, i.e., <jats:italic>θ</jats:italic> in <jats:italic>x</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>y</jats:italic> directions are the same <jats:italic>θ</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>x</jats:italic></jats:sub> = <jats:italic>θ</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>y</jats:italic></jats:sub>, which is not realistic. Therefore, the soil anisotropy (i.e., <jats:italic>θ</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>x</jats:italic></jats:sub> ≠<jats:italic> θ</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>y</jats:italic></jats:sub>) was considered carefully in this study. It was found that the probability of failure for anisotropic soil might be significantly higher than the isotropic soil.</jats:p>

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2023 The author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record