Where should we meet? Mapping social network interactions of sleepy lizards shows sex-dependent social network structure
| dc.contributor.author | Spiegel, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sih, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Leu, S.T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bull, C.M. | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Social network analyses allow researchers to describe patterns of social interactions and their consequences in animal societies. Since direct observations in natural settings are often difficult, researchers often use tracking technologies to build proximity-based social networks. However, because both social behaviour (e.g. conspecific attraction) and environmental heterogeneity (e.g. resources attracting individuals independently) affect rates of interaction, identifying the processes that shape social networks is challenging. We tracked sleepy lizards, Tiliqua rugosa, using global positioning system (GPS) telemetry to investigate whether they show conspecific attraction or avoidance beyond any shared space use driven by environmental heterogeneity. Since these lizards have strong pair bonds and nonoverlapping core home ranges, we predicted different interaction rates between inter- and intrasex dyads and compared social network indices among dyad types (maleemale, femaleefemale and intersex) using node-identity permutation tests.We also mapped interactions onto the home ranges (using distance from the centre as an index) and contrasted observed social networks with those expected from a spatially explicit null model. We found that dyad types differed in their interaction patterns. Intersex dyads had stronger connections (higher edge weight) than a null expectation, and stronger than for same-sex dyads. Samesex dyads did not differ in edge weight from the null expectation, but were significantly more common (higher degree). Males had larger home ranges than females and consequently maleemale dyads interacted further away from their home range centres. Moreover, the locations of these interactions also differed from the null expectations more strongly than other dyad types. Hence, we conclude that males predominantly interacted with each other at the peripheries of their home range, presumably reflecting territorial behaviour. By applying a novel analysis technique, we accounted for the nonsocial component of space use and revealed sex-specific interaction patterns and the contribution of conspecific attraction to the social structure in this species. More generally we report how mapping the locations of nonrandom interaction rates provides broad information on the behaviours they represent. | |
| dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Orr Spiegel, Andrew Sih, Stephan T. Leu, C. Michael Bull | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Animal Behaviour, 2018; 136:207-215 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.11.001 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0003-3472 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1095-8282 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | Leu, S.T. [0000-0003-2547-5056] | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/122974 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.grant | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP1094894 | |
| dc.rights | © 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. | |
| dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.11.001 | |
| dc.subject | Movement ecology; phenotypic attachment; randomization test; social network analysis; socioecology; space use patterns; spatially explicit model | |
| dc.title | Where should we meet? Mapping social network interactions of sleepy lizards shows sex-dependent social network structure | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published |