Ventricular arrhythmia burden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic

Date

2021

Authors

O’Shea, C.J.
Thomas, G.
Middeldorp, M.E.
Harper, C.
Elliott, A.D.
Ray, N.
Lau, D.H.
Campbell, K.
Sanders, P.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

European Heart Journal, 2021; 42(5):520-528

Statement of Responsibility

Catherine J O’Shea, Gijo Thomas, Melissa E Middeldorp, Curtis Harper, Adrian D Elliott, Noemi Ray ... et al.

Conference Name

Abstract

Aims: Our objective was to determine the ventricular arrhythmia burden in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients during COVID-19. Methods and results: In this multicentre, observational, cohort study over a 100-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA, we assessed ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients from 20 centres in 13 states, via remote monitoring. Comparison was via a 100-day control period (late 2019) and seasonal control period (early 2019). The primary outcome was the impact of COVID-19 on ventricular arrhythmia burden. The secondary outcome was correlation with COVID-19 incidence. During the COVID-19 period, 5963 ICD patients underwent remote monitoring, with 16 942 episodes of treated ventricular arrhythmias (2.8 events per 100 patient-days). Ventricular arrhythmia burden progressively declined during COVID-19 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias amongst the high COVID-19 incidence states was significantly reduced compared with those in low incidence states [odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54–0.69, P < 0.001]. Comparing patients remotely monitored during both COVID-19 and control periods (n = 2458), significantly fewer ventricular arrhythmias occurred during COVID-19 [incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.79, P < 0.001]. This difference persisted when comparing the 1719 patients monitored during both the COVID-19 and seasonal control periods (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.85, P < 0.001). Conclusions: During COVID-19, there was a 32% reduction in ventricular arrhythmias needing device therapies, coinciding with measures of social isolation. There was a 39% reduction in the proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias in states with higher COVID-19 incidence. These findings highlight the potential role of real-life stressors in ventricular arrhythmia burden in individuals with ICDs.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record