Energy management on a nectar diet: can sunbirds meet the challenges of low temperature and dilute food?
Date
2010
Authors
Kohler, A.
Verburgt, L.
McWhorter, T.
Nicolson, S.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Functional Ecology, 2010; 24(6):1241-1251
Statement of Responsibility
Angela Köhler, Luke Verburgt, Todd J. McWhorter and Susan W. Nicolson
Conference Name
Abstract
1. Animals commonly experience variation in both food quality and metabolic requirements, and must regulate their food intake to maintain energy balance. 2. We exposed captive whitebellied (Cinnyris talatala) and amethyst (Chalcomitra amethystina) sunbirds (Nectariniidae) to different nectar sugar concentrations (0·25, 0·5 and 1 m sucrose), i.e. food qualities, and ambient temperatures (5, 15 and 25 °C), i.e. energy requirements, to examine the effects on food intake, feeding patterns and body mass of the birds. 3. Both species compensated for decreased dietary sugar concentration by increasing food intake. While whitebellied sunbirds showed a constant sugar intake over the range of diet concentrations, amethyst sunbirds ingested less sugar on 0·25 m than on 0·5 m sucrose. During acute short‐term exposure to 5 °C, birds increased food and thus sugar intake on all diet concentrations by almost 27%, compared to the similar intake at 15 and 25 °C. Despite increased food consumption, all birds lost more body mass at 5 and 15 °C than at 25 °C. 4. Adjustment of food intake in both species took place via changes in feeding frequency, with the duration of feeding events unchanged. 5. Apparent sugar assimilation in whitebellied sunbirds was >99%, irrespective of diet concentration and temperature. A chemical reactor model of digestive capacity based on measurements of intestinal hydrolytic capacity mostly underestimated the maximal food intake of whitebellied sunbirds in the cold, but predicted higher maximal intake for amethyst sunbirds than observed on most diet concentrations. 6. We conclude that physiological constraints impose upper limits on compensatory feeding in sunbirds. These constraints are mainly digestive at low temperature and osmoregulatory on dilute diets, while the combination of both stresses leads to additional metabolic costs. 7. The moderate mass loss of both species when exposed to these energy challenges suggests that behavioural changes and/or hypothermia may be used to reduce energy expenditure.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 British Ecological Society