Australian approaches to the disclosure of child sexual abuse: reviewing the grey literature
| dc.contributor.author | Thain, E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Perfect, D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Collins, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Borges Jelinic, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bromfield Smith, L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Leary, P. | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Understanding of the process of disclosure for victim-survivors' of child sexual abuse (CSA) has increased in recent decades. Disclosure is a pivotal step in the healing journey for many victim-survivors (Chouliara et al., 2014). However, disclosure is rarely a straightforward process. It involves a complex interplay of interactions with individuals, communities, and institutions throughout the lifespan of victim-survivors. In Australia, formal conversations about CSA and disclosure were brought to the forefront by landmark events such as the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (RC). The RC represented a watershed moment in the national understanding of CSA, creating significant policy and practice implications. Its emphasis on truth-telling not only validated the experiences of many victim-survivors but also underscored the societal and institutional failures that had compounded their suffering. Since the RC, shifts in both public and personal understandings of disclosure have continued to evolve in Australia. Social and cultural practices—shaped by repeated actions, learned behaviours, and systemic reinforcements—have been influenced by changes in media representation, government policies, statutory reforms, and broader cultural dynamics. The conclusion of the RC in 2017 marked a turning point in these narratives, with subsequent inquiries, such as the 2023 Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government’s Responses to CSA in Institutional Settings, reinforcing the ongoing need for open dialogue and systemic change. This report examines publicly available grey literature on CSA disclosure from 2017 to 2024, with a focus on understanding the broader cultural context and evolving attitudes surrounding disclosure in Australia. By analysing these sources, the report highlights how the post-Royal Commission period (2017–2024) reflects shifts in societal attitudes, practices, and approaches to CSA disclosure. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.25954/srrb-z428 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/41654 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of South Australia, Australian Centre for Child Protection | |
| dc.publisher.place | South Australia | |
| dc.relation.funding | National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse | |
| dc.rights | Copyright 2025 National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse Limited (ABN 41 656 560 570) January 22, 2025. | |
| dc.subject | victim-survivor | |
| dc.subject | child sexual abuse | |
| dc.subject | Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse | |
| dc.subject | disclosure | |
| dc.subject | sexual abuse | |
| dc.subject | survivor | |
| dc.title | Australian approaches to the disclosure of child sexual abuse: reviewing the grey literature | |
| dc.type | Report | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | |
| ror.fileinfo | 12298553310001831 13298553300001831 Archived Evidence | |
| ror.mmsid | 9916941533001831 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- 9916941533001831_12298553310001831_9916941533001831_NTRO_Output_20250122_NTRO Report CSA_Disclosure Grey Literature Review_Final.pdf
- Size:
- 590.73 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Published version