Kookaburra: anti-tales of laughing doom
Files
Date
2021
Authors
Mitchell, Gretta Jade
Editors
Advisors
Prosser, Rosslyn
Samuelson, Meg
Samuelson, Meg
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Thesis
Citation
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Volume 1. is a creative response to the aesthetics of black humour. Taking as its catalyst André Breton’s Anthologie de l’humour noir, the writing is broken into three major sections: ‘summer school texts’; ‘philosophy in the dark’; and ‘contra/diction: forget me’. Formally, each section is divergent from the others while all are guided by situationist détournement. Together they detail a dark vision of an hostile dystopian Australia. Kookaburra’s quest, born out of despair, to learn how to laugh within the abysmal alienation of twenty-first century doom takes many incongruous detours: from feminist surrealism, through anarchic postmarxism and dialectical idealism, to ultra-left social media memes and melancholic black metal. As a research project on the aesthetics of black humour, the writing takes a stance against sentimentality — its mortal enemy — against corruption morally masked, against ideology as invisible. Imagining a hard-won laughter in the face of horrors and hurt, Kookaburra is a fraught nightmarish text, non-didactic and bound solitarily by the anti-ethics of its dark aesthetics where only a desperate recourse to form can save us from the scandal of content, where experimental writing is understood to be the perpetual amoral subversion of prevailing regimes. Volume 2. functions as an implicit narrative addendum to further problematise the writing by elucidating creative research through intellectual obfuscation and philosophical nihilism. Like the novel, the exegesis is an experimental text of black humour aesthetics; unlike the novel, it is a self-negating academic exercise, one that calls upon dialectics in order to think against its own thought.
School/Discipline
School of Humanities : English and Creative Writing
Dissertation Note
Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Humanities, 2021
Provenance
This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals