Current studentsExisting staffContact us
 

Breaches of natural justice in alternative dispute resolution of construction disputes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCoggins, J.K.
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractArbitration, expert determination and statutory adjudication are three of the most commonly used forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) used in the construction industry. For a quasi-judicial ADR process to be effective, it needs to provide an appropriate balance between procedural fairness and the need for finality of outcome. This is not necessarily the case where the parties have agreed to allow a third party to determine their dispute in a more informal procedural manner. This article considers the extent to which the court requires the rules of natural justice to be applied in arbitration, expert determination and statutory adjudication.
dc.identifier.citationBuilding and Construction Law Journal, 2013; 29(3):247-255
dc.identifier.issn0815-6050
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.8/153165
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLawbook Co.
dc.rightsCopyright 2015 Thomson Reuters
dc.source.urihttps://trtasso.thomson.com/sp/startSSO.ping?PartnerIdpId=https://idp.unisa.edu.au/openathens%26TargetResource=https://anzlaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I519815759c7c11ea89ea91c88091df40/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default%26contextData=(sc.Default)%26VR=3.0%26RS=cblt1.0
dc.subjectconstruction disputes
dc.subjectarbitration
dc.subjectexpert determination
dc.subjectstatutory adjudication
dc.titleBreaches of natural justice in alternative dispute resolution of construction disputes
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.mmsid9915909937001831

Files

Collections