An examination of the relationship between sunlight exposure and hot flush in working women

Files

Date

2020

Authors

Xu, Q.
Esterman, A.
Dorrian, J.
Warland, J.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Chronobiology International, 2020; 37(3):425-437

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

We examined whether sunlight affects hot flushes in working menopausal women and explored effect modification by shift work and season. In this prospective cohort study, daily hot flush score (outcome) was measured by the 7-day North Central Cancer Treatment Group Daily Vasomotor Symptoms Diary. Daily duration of sunlight (≥2000 lux) was recorded by the HOBO MX2202 pendant. Both variables were measured in two 7-day data collection phases. T0 data were collected during the Australian Summer (December 2017, January and February 2018); and T1 data were collected in the Australian winter (June, July and August 2018). Linear mixed effects model was used. Shift work and season were both confounders and effect modifiers. To detect a median effect size of R2 = 0.2, 34 women were required to achieve an effective sample size of 41. A total of 49 menopausal women were recruited, 11 shift and 38 day workers. Some 13 women had various missing observations. For shift workers, an hour increase in sunlight exposure was associated with a 1.4-point reduction in hot flush score (p = .016). This relationship was not significant for day workers (p = .185). The finding of this study suggests increased sunlight exposure might improve hot flushes in menopausal shift workers who are moderately bothered by hot flushes, but probably not in day workers. The possible role of shift-work associated circadian disruption on estrogen level in regard to elevated intensity and frequency of hot flush in menopausal women is discussed.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Data source: Supplemental material, https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2020.1737101

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2020 Taylor & Francis Access Condition Notes: Accepted manuscript available on Open Access

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record