Parliamentary Sovereignty and Popular Sovereignty in the UK Constitution
Date
2022
Authors
Goldsworthy, J.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Cambridge Law Journal, 2022; 81(2):273-293
Statement of Responsibility
Jeffrey Goldsworthy
Conference Name
Abstract
Rivka Weill claims that in the nineteenth century the foundation of the UK constitution changed from parliamentary sovereignty to popular sovereignty, originally as a matter of constitutional convention but today as a matter of law. I argue, to the contrary, that parliamentary sovereignty as a legal principle and popular sovereignty as a political principle are perfectly compatible. Constitutional conventions are essentially political not legal requirements. Therefore, a constitutional convention requiring popular approval of constitutional change, if it ever existed, would not have violated parliamentary sovereignty. But if it did exist, it was displaced by the Parliament Act 1911 and has not been revived since. Moreover, there is no evidence that courts today have legal authority to enforce any requirement, conventional or legal, requiring such approval.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge