A genealogical analysis of the concept of 'good' teaching: a polemic

dc.contributor.authorStolz, S.A.
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIn this essay I intentionally employ Nietzsche's genealogical method as a means to critique the complex concept of ‘good’ teaching, and at the same time reconstitute ‘good’ teaching in a form that is radically different from contemporary accounts. In order to do this, I start out by undertaking a genealogical analysis to both reveal the complicated historical development of ‘good’ teaching and also disentangle the intertwining threads that remain hidden from us so we are aware of the core threads that hold it together. Two major threads are identified in my analysis, which I refer to as: Genealogy I: Teaching as applied science or practice; and, Genealogy II: Teaching as a vocational calling or neutral profession. With this in mind, I take the two value systems (Genealogy I and II) presented in my critique of ‘good’ teaching, and rather than return to old, or create new values, I argue that the true task of any educational endeavour is to make human beings human. Therefore, in the spirit of Nietzsche, I revive and extend Nietzsche's account of Bildung as a dynamic way of living timeless educational aims, such as learning to see, think, speak, write and feel in becoming true human beings.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySteven A. Stolz
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Philosophy of Education, 2018; 52(1):144-162
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-9752.12270
dc.identifier.issn0309-8249
dc.identifier.issn1467-9752
dc.identifier.orcidStolz, S.A. [0000-0001-5900-0329]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/126203
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights© 2018 The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12270
dc.titleA genealogical analysis of the concept of 'good' teaching: a polemic
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files