The impact of value engineering on embodied greenhouse gas emissions in the built environment: a hybrid life cycle assessment
Date
2020
Authors
Yu, M.
Robati, M.
Oldfield, P.
Wiedmann, T.
Crawford, R.
Nezhad, A.A.
Carmichael, D.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Building and Environment, 2020; 168(106452):1-14
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
While traditional value engineering (VE) is primarily driven by cost saving, this study aims to comprehensively and reliably investigating the impact of traditional VE on the embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the Australian built environment. An Australian-specific hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) is developed and applied to a mixed-use building complex located in central Sydney, Australia. A list of GHG emissions intensities (GEIs) for 118 construction products is derived from hybrid LCA, demonstrating an average increase of 20% than the corresponding process-based GEIs. By applying the hybrid GEIs, the assessment of the case study building proves that traditional VE can potentially provide environmental benefits through the dematerialisation of the building. These benefits are small in this instance, with a capital cost reduction of 0.72% equating to an embodied GHG reduction of 0.32%, or a total of −267 t CO2e (i.e. -3 kg CO2e/m2 gross floor area), but if such savings were rolled out across the entirety of new building stock in Australia, the accumulated GHG emissions reduction would be significant. Concrete, reinforcing steel and timber form work are the hotspots for cost and embodied GHG emissions reduction. Manufacturing and electricity are the originating industries that jointly contribute to more than 80% of the embodied GHG emissions.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2019 Elsevier