Rethinking pain threshold as a zone of uncertainty
Files
(Published version)
Date
2019
Authors
Madden, V.J.
Kamerman, P.R.
Catley, M.J.
Bellan, V.
Russek, L.N.
Camfferman, D.
Moseley, L.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Other
Citation
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
DOI
Abstract
The pain threshold is traditionally conceptualised as a boundary that lies between painful and non-painful events, suggesting a reasonably stable relationship between stimulus and response. In two previous experiments, participants received laser stimuli of various intensities and rated each stimulus on the Sensation and Pain Rating Scale (SPARS), which includes ranges for rating painful and non-painful events and clearly defines the presumed boundary between them. In the second experiment, participants also provided ratings on the conventional 0-100 Numerical Rating Scale for pain (NRS) and a new rating scale for non-painful events. Those data showed the SPARS to have a curvilinear stimulus-response relationship, reflecting that several different intensities may be rated as painful and non-painful in different trials. This suggests that participants were uncertain about painfulness over a range of intensities and calls into question the idea of a boundary between non-painful and painful events. The current study aimed to determine the number of different stimulus intensities across which each participant provided ‘painful’ and ‘non-painful’ reports in different trials