Confrustion in learning from erroneous examples: does type of prompted self-explanation make a difference?
Date
2019
Authors
Richey, J.E.
McLaren, B.M.
Andres Bray, M.
Mogessie, M.
Scruggs, R.
Baker, R.
Star, J.
Editors
Isotani, S.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Book chapter
Citation
Event/exhibition information: 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED), Chicago, Il, 25/06/2019-29/06/2019
Source details - Title: Artificial Intelligence In Education (aied 2019), Pt I, 2019 / Isotani, S. (ed./s), vol.11625 LNAI, pp.445-457
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Confrustion, a mix of confusion and frustration sometimes experienced while grappling with instructional materials, is not necessarily detrimental to learning. Prior research has shown that studying erroneous examples can increase students' experiences of confrustion, while at the same time helping them learn and overcome their misconceptions. In the study reported in this paper, we examined students' knowledge and misconceptions about decimal numbers before and after they interacted with an intelligent tutoring system presenting either erroneous examples targeting misconceptions (erroneous example condition) or practice problems targeting the same misconceptions (problem-solving condition). While students in both conditions significantly improved their performance from pretest to posttest, students in the problem-solving condition improved significantly more and experienced significantly less confrustion. When controlling for confrustion levels, there were no differences in performance. This study is interesting in that, unlike prior studies, the higher confrustion that resulted from studying erroneous examples was not associated with better learning outcomes; instead, it was associated with poorer learning. We propose several possible explanations for this different outcome and hypothesize that revisions to the explanation prompts to make them more expert-like may have also made them - and the erroneous examples that they targeted - less understandable and less effective. Whether prompted self-explanation options should be modeled after the shorter, less precise language students tend to use or the longer, more precise language of experts is an open question, and an important one both for understanding the mechanisms of self-explanation and for designing self-explanation options deployed in instructional materials.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2019 Springer