A systematic review of the external and internal workloads experienced during games-based drills in basketball players

dc.contributor.authorO'Grady, C.J.
dc.contributor.authorFox, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorDalbo, V.J.
dc.contributor.authorScanlan, A.T.
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstract<h4>Purpose</h4>To systematically quantify the external and internal workloads reported during games-based drills in basketball and identify the effects of different modifiable factors on the workloads encountered.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for original research published up until January 2, 2019. The search included terms relevant to workload, games-based drills, and basketball. Studies were screened using predefined selection criteria, and methodological quality was assessed prior to data extraction.<h4>Results</h4>The electronic search yielded 8,284 studies with 3,411 duplicates. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, with quality scores ranging from 9 to 10 out of 11. Factors regularly modified during games-based drills among the included studies were team size, playing area, playing and rest time, and game alterations. Games-based drills containing smaller team sizes elicited greater external and internal workloads compared to larger team sizes. Furthermore, full-court games-based drills elicited greater external and internal workloads compared to half-court drills, while continuous games-based drills elicited greater internal workloads compared to intermittent drills.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This review provides a comprehensive collation of data indicating the external and internal workloads reported during different games-based drills in various samples of basketball players. Furthermore, evidence is provided for basketball coaches to consider when prescribing games-based drills and modifying factors during drills across the season. Current literature suggests that smaller team sizes and full-court playing areas elicit greater external and internal workloads than larger team sizes and half-court drills, respectively. Furthermore, continuous games-based drills elicit greater internal workloads than intermittent drills.
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2020; 15(5):603-616
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2019-0785
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.issn1555-0273
dc.identifier.orcidFox, J.L. [0000-0001-8367-5297]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11541.2/40986
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
dc.rightsCopyright 2020 Human Kinetics, Inc.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0785
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPerception
dc.subjectHeart Rate
dc.subjectBasketball
dc.subjectPhysical Exertion
dc.subjectPhysical Conditioning, Human
dc.titleA systematic review of the external and internal workloads experienced during games-based drills in basketball players
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished
ror.mmsid9916925031001831

Files

Collections