Anabasine‐based measurement of cigarette consumption using wastewater analysis

Date

2020

Authors

Bade, R.
White, J.M.
Tscharke, B.J.
Ghetia, M.
Abdelaziz, A.
Gerber, C.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Drug Testing and Analysis, 2020; 12(9):1393-1398

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Community tobacco use can be monitored over time using wastewater‐based epidemiological approaches by estimating mass loads of nicotine and its metabolites, cotinine or hydroxycotinine, in wastewater. However, due to the use of nicotine in smoking cessation products, other sources of nicotine contribute to cotinine and hydroxycotinine loads. Use of nicotine replacement therapies could vary in space and time and mask true rates of tobacco consumption. Therefore, this work evaluated the content of tobacco specific markers, anatabine and anabasine, in cigarettes, in urine of smokers, and in wastewater. Results indicated that the anabasine content in both licit and illicit cigarettes in Australia is less variable than anatabine and is therefore considered a better measure of tobacco consumption. A study determining the excretion of tobacco‐specific alkaloids of smoking and non‐smoking volunteers gave an average urinary mass load of anabasine of 4.38 μg/L/person and a daily mass load of 1.13 μg/day/person. Finally, this was compared to mass loads of anabasine from wastewater‐based epidemiology data of 3 μg/day/person to estimate cigarette rates in a South Australian city: equivalent to 2.6 cigarettes/person/day. The rate of decline of cigarette use was greater when using anabasine as a measure of consumption compared to cotinine. This is the first study to estimate the rate of anabasine excretion, which can be used to estimate tobacco use independent of therapeutically prescribed nicotine.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Data source: Supporting Information, https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2874

Access Status

Rights

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Access Condition Notes: Accepted manuscript available after 1 July 2021

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record