Subtle differences in commercial heparins can have serious consequences for cardiopulmonary bypass patients : a randomized controlled trial
Date
2012
Authors
Arsenault, K.A.
Paikin, J.S.
Hirsh, J.
Dale, B.
Whitlock, R.P.
Teoh, K.
Young, E.
Ginsberg, J.S.
Weitz, J.I.
Eikelboom, J.W.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012; 144(4):944-950
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Objective: To compare the potency, reversibility, and perioperative bleeding risk of Hepalean with those of PPC heparin.
Conclusions: PPC heparin use was associated with greater heparin and protamine dose requirements than Hepalean. These findings indicate that heparin preparations are not interchangeable and suggest that a direct comparison of the potency with the brand in use is needed if a change is made to ensure that the agents exert similar anticoagulant effects in vivo.
Methods: Because in vitro testing failed to detect differences in the potency or protamine reversibility of the 2 heparin preparations, we conducted a parallel group, single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to compare the anticoagulant effects of Hepalean to those of PPC heparin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Results: From June 1, 2011, to June 30, 2011, we randomly assigned 11 patients to receive PPC heparin and 10 to receive Hepalean. Despite similar initial doses of heparin, the median initial activated clotting time was numerically lower in the PPC heparin group than in the Hepalean group (median, 516.0 seconds; interquartile range, 481.0-633.0; vs median, 584.0 seconds, interquartile range, 520.0-629.0; P = .418). Those given PPC heparin required a greater total heparin dose (median, 46,000.0 U; interquartile range, 39,500.0-60,000.0 vs median, 34,500.0 U; interquartile range, 32,250.0-37,000.0; P = .011) and a greater dose of heparin per kilogram than those given Hepalean (median, 572.9 U/kg; interquartile range, 443.0-659.7 vs median, 401.1 U/kg; interquartile range, 400.0-419.4; P = .003). The key secondary results included an increased median total protamine dose (median, 600.0 mg; interquartile range, 550.0-700.0; vs median, 500.0 mg; interquartile range, 425.0-542.5; P = .026) and a trend toward increased chest tube output within 24 hours (median, 830.0 mL; interquartile range, 425.0-1135.0; vs median, 702.5 mL; interquartile range, 550.0-742.5; P = .324).
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Data source: Supplement materials, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522312006071?via%3Dihub
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery