Gestational ageism

dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, D.
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractPublished guidelines for resuscitation of extremely premature infants emphasize the importance of the gestational age of the infant. However, some ethicists and paediatricians have questioned these guidelines, suggesting that this may represent a form of discrimination. A policy of nonresuscitation of elderly patients older than a certain age would constitute a form of ageism and would likely be unacceptable to the broader community. Are resuscitation decisions for premature newborn infants analogous to resuscitation of elderly patients? Are current neonatal resuscitation guidelines discriminatory? This article looks at the relationship between discrimination based on gestational age and chronological age. There are 2 levels of gestational ageism and 2 separate strands of argument against gestational age guidelines. I conclude that resuscitation decisions for premature infants share many features with those for elderly patients, although there are also some relevant differences. I propose the use of gestational age equivalence as an alternative framework for practice.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDominic J.C. Wilkinson
dc.identifier.citationJAMA Pediatrics, 2012; 166(6):567-572
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1262
dc.identifier.issn1072-4710
dc.identifier.issn1538-3628
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/72857
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmer Medical Assoc
dc.rights© 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1262
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectResuscitation
dc.subjectResuscitation Orders
dc.subjectPrejudice
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subjectGestational Age
dc.subjectInfant, Newborn
dc.subjectInfant, Premature
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.titleGestational ageism
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files