Understanding the mental health effects of instability in the private rental sector: A longitudinal analysis of a national cohort

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLi, A.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, E.
dc.contributor.authorBentley, R.
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractUsing a population-based longitudinal dataset in Australia over nearly 20 years, this study examines the impact of tenure instability on mental health and psychological distress among a low-income working-age population. The analysis compares private renters (who are notable for their relative tenure insecurity in the Australian context) and homeowners with similar sociodemographic characteristics. To enhance group comparability and address the presence of time-varying covariates that confound and mediate the relationship between tenure exposure and mental health, marginal structural models were used applying weights estimated cumulatively over time. The results show that while private rental tenants report worse mental health than homeowners initially (mental health difference: Beta = −5.29, 95%CI −7.61 to −2.97; psychological distress difference: Beta = 1.77, 95%CI 0.55 to 2.99), this difference diminishes to become statistically indistinguishable by 5–6 years of occupancy (mental health difference at year 6: Beta = −2.09, 95%CI −4.31 to 0.13, predicted mental health increases: from 65.06 to 69.83 for private renters and from 70.46 to 72.02 for homeowners; psychological distress difference at year 5: Beta = 0.81, 95%CI −0.09 to 1.71, predicted psychological distress decreases: from 19.85 to 18.04 for private renters and from 17.95 to 17.10 for homeowners). Residential stability is particularly beneficial for private renters in early middle adulthood (35–44 years), with each additional year of stable occupancy for private renters correlated with a 0.99 (95%CI 0.46 to 1.53) increase in mental health and a −0.47 (95%CI −0.69 to −0.24) decrease in psychological distress. The findings provide evidence that stable and secure rental tenure is protective of mental health, and the mental health of stable renters becomes comparable to that of homeowners over time. This adds support for housing policies that promote and improve the stability and security of rental tenure.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAng Li, Emma Baker, Rebecca Bentley
dc.identifier.citationSocial Science and Medicine, 2022; 296
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114778
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536
dc.identifier.issn1873-5347
dc.identifier.orcidBaker, E. [0000-0002-9390-0491]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2440/135873
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1196456
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114778
dc.subjectAustralia; Housing instability; Housing tenure; Private rental; Homeowner; Mental health; Psychological distress; Marginal structural model
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshCohort Studies
dc.subject.meshMental Health
dc.subject.meshHousing
dc.subject.meshPoverty
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAustralia
dc.titleUnderstanding the mental health effects of instability in the private rental sector: A longitudinal analysis of a national cohort
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Gender Studies and Social Analysis publications