The ALCCaS Trial: a randomized controlled trial comparing quality of life following laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcCombie, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorFrizelle, F.
dc.contributor.authorBagshaw, P.F.
dc.contributor.authorFrampton, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorHewett, P.J.
dc.contributor.authorMcMurrick, P.J.
dc.contributor.authorRieger, N.
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, M.J.
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, A.R.
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study reports the quality-of-life assessment of the ALCCaS trial. The ALCCaS trial compared laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. It reported equivalence of survival at 5 years. Quality of life was measured as a secondary outcome. Objective: This study aimed to report on the quality of life data of the ALCCaS Trial. Design: This study reports a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic with open colonic resection. Settings: The study was conducted in Australasia. Patients: Patients with a single adenocarcinoma of the right, left, or sigmoid colon, presenting for elective treatment, were eligible for randomization. Interventions: Open and laparoscopic colonic resections were performed. Main Outcome Measures: Patient symptoms and quality of life were measured using the Symptoms Distress Scale, the Quality of Life Index, and the Global Quality of Life Score preoperatively, and at 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months postoperatively. Results: Of the 592 patients enrolled in ALCCaS, 425 completed at least 1 quality-of-life measure at 4 time points (71.8% of cohort). Those who received the laparoscopic intervention had better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01), Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), and Global Quality of Life (p < 0.01). In intention-to-treat analyses, those assigned to laparoscopic surgery had a better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01) and Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), whereas Global Quality of Life was not significant (p = 0.056). The subscales better for laparoscopic resection at all 3 postoperative time points were appetite, insomnia, pain, fatigue, bowel, daily living, and health (p < 0.05). Limitations: The primary limitation was the different response rates for the 3 quality-of-life measures. Conclusions: There was a short-term gain in quality of life maintained at 2 months postsurgery for those who received laparoscopic relative to open colonic resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A691.
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAndrew M. McCombie, Frank Frizelle, Philip Frederick Bagshaw, Chris M. Frampton, Peter J. Hewett, Paul John McMurrick, Nicholas Rieger, Michael J. Solomon, Andrew R. Stevenson
dc.identifier.citationDiseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2018; 61(10):1156-1162
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/DCR.0000000000001165
dc.identifier.issn0012-3706
dc.identifier.issn1530-0358
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/121140
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/207815
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/349381
dc.rights© 2018 The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000001165
dc.subjectColonic resection; colorectal cancer; laparoscopic; quality of life; randomized controlled trial
dc.titleThe ALCCaS Trial: a randomized controlled trial comparing quality of life following laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.publication-statusPublished

Files

Collections

Medicine publications